Confession of judgment
From LawGuru Wiki
Confession of judgment, in law, is a legal term with two meanings.
Use in contract law
First, in its broader sense, it refers to a type of contract (or a clause with such a provision) in which a party agrees to let the other party enter a judgment against him or her. Such contracts are highly controversial and are usually invalidated as a violation of due process by courts, since the obligor is essentially contracting away his right to raise any legitimate defenses. Isbell v. County of Sonoma, 21 Cal. 3d 61, 65 (1978) [1]. Such clauses should be distinguished from liquidated damages clauses, which do not result in binding judgments against the obligor.
Use by the U.S. Solicitor General
Second, it refers to a practice of the United States Solicitor General in his role representing the federal government before the Supreme Court of the United States. By "confessing judgment," the Solicitor General declares that the federal government's position in a case has been wrong all along. As a result, the case is dropped, even when it had been supported by a lower appellate court.
Thus a lower court's decision can be reversed, effectively, in two different ways: first by a reversal by the Supreme Court itself, or second by a "confession of judgment" by the Solicitor General who refuses to prosecute a cause that he considers to be unjust. This considerable power has caused some to nickname the Solicitor General the "Tenth Justice" of the Supreme Court (which has nine Justices on it).
It is thought to be in defense of this practice that former Solicitor General Frederick W. Lehmann famously stated: "The United States wins its point whenever justice is done its citizens in the courts"; the quote is inscribed inside the rotunda of the United States Attorney General's office.
